Categories
Uncategorized
Have You Had Your Hug Today  (Yellow Rock)
 
Hugs and heart health
 

The side effects of this medicine are all good!

We all know a hug feels good, but what’s the connection between hugs and heart health?

…Well, it appears that human contact through hugs lowers blood pressure and reduces stress, which cuts the risk of heart disease. Hugs have also been shown to improve overall mood, increase nerve activity, and a host of other beneficial effects. Positive physical touch has an immediate anti-stress effect, slowing breathing and heart rate.

“A good hug speaks directly to your body and soul, making you feel loved and special,” says Mihalko Baczynski, a relationship coach.

“Hugging is all natural; it is organic, naturally sweet, no pesticides, non-fattening, no carbohydrates, no preservatives, no artificial or genetically engineered ingredients, and 100% wholesome” says Dorothy M. Neddermeyer, PhD.

Not only are hugs completely natural, they don’t cost anything either! Hugs are free! And best of all, the supply is endless.

Research proves connection between hugs and heart health

A University of North Carolina study showed that hugs increased levels of the hormone oxytocin and reduced blood pressure.

There is a scientific explanation for the seemingly magical qualities of a hug that researchers uncovered. Each time we hug, we increase the level of oxytocin in the blood. This hormone triggers a “caring” or “bonding” response in both men and women (oxytocin is most well known for stimulating contractions of the uterus during labor and the release of milk during breast-feeding).

Several animal studies lend support to this idea; for example, oxytocin levels rise and blood pressure falls in rats when their bellies are stroked.

A daily dose of oxytocin from hugging can help protect us from heart disease. And while it works for both genders, women seem to be the greater benefactors as exhibited by the second phase of the University of North Carolina study.

The North Carolina study also reinforced research findings that support from a partner, in this case a hug from a loved one, can have beneficial effects on heart health.

University of Toronto psychiatrist Brian Baker who studies how marriage affects men’s hearts says, “Male heart patients with good marriages stay healthier than do those living with conflict.” One can presume that men and women in a good marriage probably hug more than those in conflict.

http://www.smart-heart-living.com/hugs-and-heart.html

Categories
History In The News Uncategorized Video

Square Dance Calling

Categories
Uncategorized Video

Nortex Yellow Rose  Round Up dance  2013 with caller Noah Siegmann and family

 

Categories
Video

NORTEX dancers on Good Morning Texas

Categories
Uncategorized

Dixie Chainers in the News!

Dixie Chainers, one of North Texas Square and Round Dance Associations charter clubs, was featured in the Neighbors Section of the Dallas Morning News.  This great article gives a thoughtful description of Modern Square Dancing.  Talking about the updated music, health benefits and social interaction.

 http://yourcarrollton.dallasnews.com/2013/07/19/dixie-chainers-square-and-round-dance-in-carrolltonfarmers-branch-for-over-50-years/

Categories
Uncategorized

The North Texas Square and Round Dance association is pleased to announce our third annual Food Drive Dance. This year the dance will also be the 2013 Celebrating Texas ‘ Heritage – The Yellow Rose of Texas Round-Up Kickoff. The past two years we have raised over $2,000 and three tons of food. We anticipate this year will be more successful! All donations will go to the Dallas and Tarrant Counties Food Banks.

The dance is being held at the Plymouth Park United Methodist Church in Irving. The Church is located at 1615 W. Airport Fwy. and is on the north side of the highway between MacArthur and Story Road. Parking and entrance are at the back of the Church. A great group of callers and cuers, (18 in all, listed on the attached flyer), have volunteered their services. Let’s not disappoint them, they are looking for and expecting a big crowd. Square dancers you are needed, let us see if we can set two records: One – for money brought in for the Food Drive and two – attendance at a Round-Up Kickoff Dance!

The dance schedule is a follows:
4:00 to 5:00 P.M. Plus Rounds in Hall
Fun Rounds & Line Dancing in Hall
5:00 to 7:00 P.M. Square Dancing with Rounds
in both Halls.

http://netoffer.com/square-dance-club/files/2012/07/NORTEX-Round-Up-KickOff-Food-Drive-Updated-Flyer1.pdf

Categories
Uncategorized

Categories
Uncategorized

Strictly Come Square Dancing: Historian Digs Into Square Dance’s History – Speakeasy – WSJ

 
December 16, 2009, 8:00 AM
By Mary Pilon

Today’s Wall Street Journal takes a look at those struggling to save the last square dance. But where did square dancing come from?

Square dance caller and historian Phil Jamison may have found out. It’s taken the teacher of math and Appalachian studies at Warren Wilson College in Asheville, N.C., over 10 years to unearth pieces of the puzzle that have been missing for centuries.

He and other square dance historians say the story starts in France.

There, dances like quadrilles were all the rage in the late 18th century and like today’s square dances, featured four couples in a square. After the American Revolution, former colonials rejected all things British, including the country’s dances. More en vogue French instructors crossed the pond to teach their trendy moves. French terms like “do-si-do,” “allemande” and “promenade” still remain part of the modern square dancing lexicon.

The dances done in early America then didn’t have a “caller,” or someone who yells out the moves to dancers, like square dancing today. Rather, the expectation, Jamison says, was that dancers went to school, memorized the moves, then went to the ball.

Square dancing then was done mostly to live music, almost always played by African-American musicians. It’s believed that many of these musicians became callers due to the gap in literacy and formal training among slaves of the time. Jamison says he found evidence of an African-American caller dating back as early as 1819 in New Orleans. Other African-American dance moves, instruments like the banjo and fiddle, and call and response traditions were also incorporated, he says.

“Even though we don’t currently see the banjo, fiddles and square dancing as a part of African American culture,” Jamison says, “they once were.”

Calling gained popularity up and down the Appalachian range throughout the 1800s, Richard Severance, archive director of the Square Dance Foundation of New England, says.

Dancing numbers dwindled in the 19th century and opposition among religious groups of the time didn’t help recruiting, either. “There was a puritanical belief that you shouldn’t touch a young lady,” Severance says.

Later in the century, square dancing was replaced by couples dances like waltzes and polkas in city ballrooms. But square dancing still thrived in rural areas.

In the 1920s, Henry Ford became a promoter of the old style of square dancing, opening a ballroom in Michigan. Ford promoted the dance among his factory workers and their families, historians say. He thought having square dancing in schools helped children learn manners, exercise, values and grace. In 1928, save-squaredancing.com reports, boards of education across the country endorsed the Ford square dancing program. (Perhaps it is he who so many of us have to blame for our grade- and middle-school gym class trauma.)

Many soldiers took the dances overseas during World War II, Severance says. To this day, there are still square dancing communities worldwide, all still call in English.

Around the 1950s modern square dancing was standardized. Lessons, which are still taught today, comprise of 69 standard moves. When the Western attire of slacks and petticoats became the norm, it was considered casual compared to the formal tuxedoes and ballroom gowns of the time, Len Houle, president of the United Square Dancers of America says.

There are also “traditional” square dancers who base their moves more in the Appalachian style before the 1950s standardization. Today, traditionalists typically don’t require lessons and dance to live music rather than recordings. For many traditional dances, no lessons are required to enter.

Partially due to dwindling numbers, modern square dancing groups made pushes in the 1980s and 1990s to be considered the official dance or folk dance of the U.S. President Ronald Reagan made square dancing briefly the national folk dance from 1982-1983. The USDA has put its national campaign on hold for now, until the group finds a legislator to support the bill, Houle says. However, there are currently 31 states that have officially recognized square dancing.

And as reported today, the numbers of square dancers are dwindling again, from an estimated 1 million dancers in the late 1970s to around 300,000 according to the USDA. Recruitment efforts continue.

“The doors are open to anybody and everybody,” Houle says.

 

 

Categories
Uncategorized

Why do we like to dance–And move to the beat?

Columbia University neurologist John Krakauer busts a move and rolls out an answer to this query

THE THRILL OF TANGO: Scientists believe that dancing combines two of our greatest pleasures: movement and music.

 Image: © ISTOCKPHOTO/Guillermo Perales Gonzalez

Many things stimulate our brains’ reward centers, among them, coordinated movements. Consider the thrill some get from watching choreographed fight or car chase scenes in action movies. What about the enjoyment spectators get when watching sports or actually riding on a roller coaster or in a fast car?

Scientists aren’t sure why we like movement so much, but there’s certainly a lot of anecdotal evidence to suggest we get a pretty big kick out of it. Maybe synchronizing music, which many studies have shown is pleasing to both the ear and brain, and movement—in essence, dance—may constitute a pleasure double play.

Music is known to stimulate pleasure and reward areas like the orbitofrontal cortex, located directly behind one’s eyes, as well as a midbrain region called the ventral striatum. In particular, the amount of activation in these areas matches up with how much we enjoy the tunes. In addition, music activates the cerebellum, at the base of the brain, which is involved in the coordination and timing of movement.

So, why is dance pleasurable?

First, people speculate that music was created through rhythmic movement—think: tapping your foot. Second, some reward-related areas in the brain are connected with motor areas. Third, mounting evidence suggests that we are sensitive and attuned to the movements of others’ bodies, because similar brain regions are activated when certain movements are both made and observed. For example, the motor regions of professional dancers’ brains show more activation when they watch other dancers compared with people who don’t dance.

This kind of finding has led to a great deal of speculation with respect to mirror neurons—cells found in the cortex, the brain’s central processing unit, that activate when a person is performing an action as well as watching someone else do it. Increasing evidence suggests that sensory experiences are also motor experiences. Music and dance may just be particularly pleasurable activators of these sensory and motor circuits. So, if you’re watching someone dance, your brain’s movement areas activate; unconsciously, you are planning and predicting how a dancer would move based on what you would do.

That may lead to the pleasure we get from seeing someone execute a movement with expert skill—that is seeing an action that your own motor system cannot predict via an internal simulation. This prediction error may be rewarding in some way.

So, if that evidence indicates that humans like watching others in motion (and being in motion themselves), adding music to the mix may be a pinnacle of reward.

Music, in fact, can actually refine your movement skills by improving your timing, coordination and rhythm. Take the Brazilian folk art, Capoeira—which could be a dance masquerading as a martial art or vice versa. Many of the moves in that fighting style are choreographed, taught and practiced, along with music, making the participants more adept—and giving them the pleasure from the music as well as from performing the movement.

Adding music in this context may cross the thin line between a killing machine and a dancing machine.

 

Categories
Uncategorized

Dancing Makes You Smarter

Dancing Makes You Smarter

 

 

Use It or Lose It:  Dancing Makes You Smarter


Richard Powers

For centuries, dance manuals and other writings have lauded the health benefits of dancing, usually as physical exercise. 
More recently we’ve seen research on further health benefits of dancing, such as stress reduction and increased serotonin level, with
its sense of well-being.

Then most recently we’ve heard of another benefit:  Frequent dancing apparently makes us smarter.  A major study added to
the growing evidence that stimulating one’s mind can ward off Alzheimer’s disease and other dementia, much as physical exercise can
keep the body fit.  Dancing also increases cognitive acuity at all ages.

You may have heard about the New England Journal of Medicine
report on the effects of recreational activities on mental acuity in aging.   Here it is in a nutshell.

The 21-year study of senior citizens, 75 and older, was led by the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City, funded by the
National Institute on Aging, and published in the New England Journal of Medicine.  Their method for objectively measuring mental
acuity in aging was to monitor rates of dementia, including Alzheimer’s disease.

The study wanted to see if any physical or cognitive recreational activities influenced mental acuity.  They discovered that some
activities had a significant beneficial effect.  Other activities had none.

They studied cognitive activities such as reading books, writing for pleasure, doing crossword puzzles, playing cards and playing musical
instruments.  And they studied physical activities like playing tennis or golf, swimming, bicycling, dancing, walking for exercise
and doing housework.

One of the surprises of the study was that almost none of the physical activities appeared to offer any protection against dementia.  There
can be cardiovascular benefits of course, but the focus of this study was the mind.  There was one important exception:  the
only physical activity to offer protection against dementia was frequent dancing.

            Reading – 35% reduced risk of dementia

            Bicycling and swimming – 0%

            Doing crossword puzzles at least four days a week – 47%

            Playing golf – 0%

            Dancing frequently – 76%.

That was the greatest risk reduction of any activity studied, cognitive or physical.

Quoting Dr. Joseph Coyle, a Harvard Medical School psychiatrist who wrote an accompanying commentary:

“The cerebral cortex and hippocampus, which are critical to these activities, are remarkably plastic, and they rewire themselves based
upon their use.”

And from from the study itself, Dr. Katzman proposed these persons are more resistant to the effects of dementia as a result of having
greater cognitive reserve and increased complexity of neuronal synapses.  Like education, participation in some leisure activities
lowers the risk of dementia by improving cognitive reserve.

Our brain constantly rewires its neural pathways, as needed.  If it doesn’t need to, then it won’t.

            Aging and memory

When brain cells die and synapses weaken with aging, our nouns go first, like names of people, because there’s only one neural pathway
connecting to that stored information.  If the single neural connection to that name fades, we lose access to it.  So as we
age, we learn to parallel process, to come up with synonyms to go around these roadblocks.  (Or maybe we don’t learn to do this,
and just become a dimmer bulb.)

The key here is Dr. Katzman’s emphasis on the complexity of our neuronal synapses.  More is better.  Do whatever you can
to create new neural paths.  The opposite of this is taking the same old well-worn path over and over again, with habitual patterns
of thinking and living our lives.

When I was studying the creative process as a grad student at Stanford, I came across the perfect analogy to this:

            The more stepping stones there are across the creek,

            the easier it is to cross in your own style.

The focus of that aphorism was creative thinking, to find as many alternative paths as possible to a creative solution.  But as
we age, parallel processing becomes more critical.  Now it’s no longer a matter of style, it’s a matter of survival — getting
across the creek at all. 
Randomly dying brain cells are like stepping stones being removed one by one.  Those who had only one well-worn path of stones
are completely blocked when some are removed.  But those who spent their lives trying different mental routes each time, creating
a myriad of possible paths, still have several paths left.

The Albert Einstein College of Medicine study shows that we need to keep as many of those paths active as we can, while also generating new paths,
to maintain the complexity of our neuronal synapses.

            Why dancing?

We immediately ask two questions:

  • Why is dancing better than other activities for improving mental capabilities?

  • Does this mean all kinds of dancing, or is one kind of dancing better than another?

    That’s where this particular study falls short.  It doesn’t answer these questions as a stand-alone study.  Fortunately,
    it isn’t a stand-alone study.  It’s one of many studies, over decades, which have shown that we increase our mental capacity by
    exercising our cognitive processes.  Intelligence: Use it or lose it.  And it’s the other studies which fill in the gaps
    in this one.  Looking at all of these studies together lets us understand the bigger picture.

    Some of this is discussed here (the page you may have just came from) which looks at intelligence in dancing. 
    The essence of intelligence is making decisions.  And the concluding advice, when it comes to improving your mental
    acuity, is to involve yourself in activities which require split-second rapid-fire decision making, as opposed to rote memory (retracing
    the same well-worn paths), or just working on your physical style.

    One way to do that is to learn something new.  Not just dancing, but anything new.  Don’t worry about the probability that
    you’ll never use it in the future.  Take a class to challenge your mind.  It will stimulate the connectivity of your brain
    by generating the need for new pathways.  Difficult and even frustrating classes are better for you, as they will create a greater
    need for new neural pathways.

    Then take a dance class, which can be even better.  Dancing integrates several brain functions at once, increasing your connectivity. 
    Dancing simultaneously involves kinesthetic, rational, musical and emotional processes.

                What kind of dancing?

    Let’s go back to the study:

                Bicycling, swimming or playing golf – 0% reduced risk of dementia

    But doesn’t golf require rapid-fire decision-making?  No, not if you’re a long-time player.  You made most of the decisions when
    you first started playing, years ago.  Now the game is mostly refining your technique.  It can be good physical exercise, but
    the study showed it led to no improvement in mental acuity.

    Therefore do the kinds of dance where you must make as many split-second decisions as possible.  That’s key to maintaining true intelligence.

    Does any kind of dancing lead to increased mental acuity?  No, not all forms of dancing will produce this benefit.  Not dancing
    which, like golf or swimming, mostly works on style or retracing the same memorized paths.  The key is the decision-making.  Remember
    (from this page),
    Jean Piaget suggested that intelligence is what we use when we don’t already know what to do.

    We wish that 25 years ago the Albert Einstein College of Medicine thought of doing side-by-side comparisons of different kinds of dancing, to
    find out which was better.  But we can figure it out by looking at who they studied: senior citizens 75 and older, beginning in
    1980.  Those who danced in that particular population were former Roaring Twenties dancers (back in 1980) and then former Swing Era dancers (today),
    so the kind of dancing most of them continued to do in retirement was what they began when they were young: freestyle social dancing — basic
    foxtrot, swing, waltz and maybe some Latin.

    I’ve been watching senior citizens dance all of my life, from my parents (who met at a Tommy Dorsey dance), to retirement communities, to the Roseland Ballroom in New York. 
    I almost never see memorized sequences or patterns on the dance floor.  I mostly see easygoing, fairly simple social dancing — freestyle lead and follow.  
    But freestyle social dancing isn’t that simple!  It requires a lot of split-second decision-making, in both the lead and follow roles.

          I need to digress here:

    I want to point out that I’m not demonizing memorized sequence dancing or style-focused pattern-based ballroom dancing.  I sometimes enjoy
    sequence dances myself, and there are stress-reduction benefits of any kind of dancing, cardiovascular
    benefits of physical exercise, and even further benefits of feeling connected to a community of dancers.  So all dancing is good.

    But when it comes to preserving mental acuity, then some forms are significantly better than others.  When we talk of intelligence (use it or
    lose it) then the more decision-making we can bring into our dancing, the better.

                Who benefits more, women or men?

    In social dancing, the follow role automatically gains a benefit, by making hundreds of split-second decisions as to what to do next.  As I mentioned
    on this page, women don’t “follow”, they interpret the signals their partners are giving them, and this requires
    intelligence and decision-making, which is active, not passive. 
    This benefit is greatly enhanced by dancing with different partners, not always with the same fellow.  With different dance partners, you have to adjust
    much more and be aware of more variables.  This is great for staying smarter longer.

    But men, you can also match her degree of decision-making if you choose to do so.  (1) Really notice your partner and
    what works best for her.  Notice what is comfortable for her, where she is already going, which moves are successful with her and what
    aren’t, and constantly adapt your dancing to these observations.  That’s rapid-fire split-second decision making.   (2) Don’t lead
    the same old patterns the same way each time.  Challenge yourself to try new things.  Make more decisions more often. 
    Intelligence: use it or lose it.

    And men, the huge side-benefit is that your partners will have much more fun dancing with you when you are attentive to their dancing and
    constantly adjusting for their comfort and continuity of motion.

                Dance often

    Finally, remember that this study made another suggestion: do it often.  Seniors who did crossword puzzles four days a week
    had a measurably lower risk of dementia than those who did the puzzles once a week.  If you can’t take classes or go out dancing four
    times a week, then dance as much as you can.  More is better.

    And do it now, the sooner the better.  It’s essential to start building your cognitive reserve now.  Some day you’ll need as many
    of those stepping stones across the creek as possible.  Don’t wait — start building them now.


    July 30, 2010

    Copyright © 2010 Richard Powers

 

More thoughts and musings